<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pine Street Foundation &#187; Cognitive Decline</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pinestreetfoundation.org/tag/cognitive-decline/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pinestreetfoundation.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 16:37:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Your Mind &amp; Cancer Treatment: The Latest Research on Chemotherapy-related Cognitive Decline</title>
		<link>http://pinestreetfoundation.org/2007/03/21/your-mind-and-cancer-treatment-chemotherapy-related-cognitive-decline/</link>
		<comments>http://pinestreetfoundation.org/2007/03/21/your-mind-and-cancer-treatment-chemotherapy-related-cognitive-decline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PSFJA</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Avenues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Becoming Your Own Advocate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cognitive Decline]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinestreetfoundation.org/?p=354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2005, we addressed the issue of chemotherapy-related cognitive decline, sometimes called "chemo brain" or "chemo fog." Since then, there have been some important new studies that provide more evidence of this problem, which we discuss and summarize in this new article.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>INTRODUCTION</strong><br />
In the <a href="http://pinestreetfoundation.org/avenues/avenues12/byoa12.html">Winter 2005</a> issue of <em>Avenues</em>, we discussed the important       issue of how the mind can be negatively impacted by various conventional       cancer treatments. Commonly referred to as &#8220;chemo brain&#8221; or &#8220;chemo         fog,&#8221; patients often experience adverse effects in cognitive function.         The <a href="http://pinestreetfoundation.org/avenues/avenues12/byoa12.html">original article</a>, which provides general information on this topic,       is available by <a href="http://pinestreetfoundation.org/avenues/avenues12/byoa12.html">clicking here</a>.<span id="more-354"></span></p>
<p>In this follow-up article, we discuss and         summarize some of the latest research that has been published since 2005.         We also identify recent research on vitamin, herbal, and dietary compounds         that are known to help support brain cells, which may possibly provide         protection from chemotherapy. This research on these &#8220;neuroprotective&#8221;         compounds may point the way towards practical steps patients can take,         in collaboration with their health-care providers, to help reduce or         minimize the negative effects chemotherapy treatment can have on the         mind.</p>
<p><strong>EVIDENCE OF THE PROBLEM</strong><br />
Earlier data suggested that among breast cancer patients receiving standard-dose           chemotherapy, 18% showed cognitive deficits on post-treatment evaluations           two years after treatment.1 Among patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy,           that proportion rose to 30%. However, these numbers may be conservative           as a recent longitudinal study involving breast cancer patients showed           that high-dose chemotherapy caused changes in the brain’s       white matter in up to 70% of individuals, usually with a delayed onset       of several months after treatment.</p>
<p><strong>JOURNAL OF BIOLOGY</strong><br />
In the November 2006 issue of the <em>Journal of Biology</em>, researchers report       that chemotherapy drugs – specifically carmustine, cisplatin, and       cytosine arabinoside – were associated with increased cell damage       and death in the brains of mice; this effect was seen for weeks after the       drugs were administered.2</p>
<p>Researchers also found that neural progenitor         cells (sometimes called &#8220;neural stem cells&#8221; since they have the ability         to restore function in damaged nerve tissues) and oligodendrocytes (a         type of cell found in the brain and spinal cord that helps improve the         speed and reliability of impulse conductions, allowing faster information         processing and better motor control) are exceptionally vulnerable to         the action of chemotherapeutic drugs; this is the first study to show         definitive evidence of chemotherapy’s damaging effects on         the physical structure of the brain.</p>
<p>What is particularly interesting         about this study is that this damage was found both in vitro (cells cultured         or tested in the laboratory) and in vivo (in live animals). This is important         because it means that researchers could potentially test the effects         a drug may have on brain cells in the lab before testing it on human         subjects. Similarly, researchers could also lab test the effectiveness         of treatments to help minimize the cognitive side effects of chemotherapy         before involving actual patients.</p>
<p>In the same issue of the <em>Journal of         Biology</em>, another author notes that it had been previously believed         that irradiation was the key culprit to cognitive decline but now there         is growing evidence that confirms that chemotherapy itself – even         when used without radiotherapy – is         indeed toxic to the central nervous system.3</p>
<p><strong>JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CANCER         SOCIETY</strong><br />
In a study published in the November 2006 issue of <em>Cancer</em>, the         journal of the American Cancer Society, researchers used high-resolution         brain MRIs of breast cancer patients and controls and observed the differences.         They found that breast cancer patients had smaller grey and white matter         in the prefrontal cortex, parahippocampal gyrus, cingulate gyrus, and         precuneus one year after chemotherapy treatment. These areas of the brain         are responsible for attention, concentration, and visual memory. Encouragingly,         no difference between breast cancer patients and controls was observed         at three years after treatment, suggesting that such damage is not necessarily         permanent.</p>
<p><strong>BREAST CANCER RESEARCH &amp; TREATMENT</strong><br />
While the study in the journal <em>Cancer</em> used MRI images to determine         the effect of chemotherapy on the brain, a study published in the August         2006 issue of <em>Breast Cancer Research &amp; Treatment</em> used PET         scans to monitor blood flow in specific regions of the frontal cortex         and cerebellum. They found that blood flow was significantly altered         in patients who had received chemotherapy and that this was associated         with patients&#8217; ability to perform short-term memory tasks.4</p>
<p>Researchers also found that for patients         who received tamoxifen along with their chemotherapy, the metabolism         of the basal ganglia (a part of the brain responsible for motor movement)         was significantly decreased when compared with patients receiving chemotherapy         alone and compared to a control group.</p>
<p>In contrast to the         findings of the other studies discussed in this article, these researchers         found that changes in blood flow were found five to ten years after completion         of chemotherapy, suggesting chemotherapy can have very long-term detrimental         effects on brain cells and cognitive function.</p>
<p><strong>PRACTICAL STEPS</strong><br />
While there is increasingly compelling evidence suggesting that chemotherapy         does indeed have negative effects on the brain and central nervous system,         there is relatively little research providing guidance for what patients         can do to prevent or minimize these effects.</p>
<p><strong><em>Neuroprotective Vitamin         and Plant-derived Compounds</em></strong><br />
While generally not specific to patients undergoing chemotherapy, a considerable         amount of work has been done investigating readily available, over the         counter herbal medicines and dietary supplements that may have neuroprotective         benefits. It is important to note that most of this work has been done         using cell cultures in the laboratory or on animals; relatively few research         studies have been completed that recruited human subjects.</p>
<p>Many of these         herbal medicines and dietary supplements have long been used by practitioners         of Chinese medicine or have been studied and used for health benefits         unrelated to neuroprotection in humans. Additionally, for most of these         compounds, safe doses have been established for human consumption.</p>
<p>The research that still remains         to be done is on what specific herbal medicines or dietary supplements         would help protect brain cells from damage due to chemotherapy, and at         what specific dosage levels. Therefore, we encourage people considering         using the information presented here to review this material with their         healthcare providers prior to proceeding with treatment. Important information         to discuss in consultation include the individual suitability of specific         compounds, appropriate dosage levels, and whether they may interact with         other treatments, such as chemotherapy. An excellent resource for clinicians         detailing herb-drug or vitamin-drug interactions is the <a href="http://www.NaturalDatabase.com" target="_blank">Natural         Medicines Comprehensive Database</a>.</p>
<p><strong><em>Ginsenoside Rg1</em></strong><br />
Ginsenoside Rg1 is an active ingredient isolated from ginseng and is         most abundant in both Chinese and Korean ginseng. Ginseng is one of the         most widely known herbal medicines in the world, commonly used for its         immunostimulating and anti-tumor properties.5 Specific to its potential           neuroprotective effects, ginsenoside has been shown to enhance survival           rate of neural stem cells in vitro in a study using rat stem cell cultures.6           Commonly used dosage levels of ginseng extract range between 200 and         1000mg.5</p>
<p><strong><em>Ren Shen Yang Rong Tang</em></strong><br />
Ren Shen Yang Rong Tang is a Chinese herbal formula first published in           a Song Dynasty Chinese medical text in 990 AD. This combination of           herbs, which includes ginseng, has been shown to improve the capability         of rat oligodendrocyte precursor cells to grow and differentiate four         to five fold.7</p>
<p><em><strong>Acupuncture</strong></em><br />
Acupuncture is a technique used in Chinese medicine for many different         health concerns. A review paper has discussed the possibility that acupuncture           can promote proliferation of neural stem cells in the hippocampus (a           part of the brain used for memory and spacial navigation). Acupuncture         has been used to help Alzheimer&#8217;s patients in this way.8</p>
<p><strong><em>Antioxidants</em></strong><br />
Progenitor cells and immature oligodendrocytes are affected by oxidative         stress (damage to cells by oxidation).5,6 When oxidative stress is lower,           the body promotes self-renewal of progenitor cells and when oxidative           stress is higher, the body promotes the growth of fully matured neural           cells.7</p>
<p>Oxidative stress has not yet been identified as         a cause of progenitor cell death due to chemotherapy. However, many chemotherapy         agents cause oxidative stress throughout the body, which contributes         to both the desired therapeutic effects – and the undesired side         effects – of         chemotherapy.12-15 As explained above, the growth and survival of neural         stem cells and their precursor cells (progenitor cells and oligodendrocytes)         is in part regulated by the level of oxidation, so decreasing oxidative         stress may help to protect them.</p>
<p>Antioxidants (whether they are produced         by the body, taken as a supplement, or eaten in foods) can combat oxidative         stress and promote better survival and increased proliferation of neural         stem cells. Below are various antioxidant compounds that have been shown         in animal or laboratory studies to promote growth or survival of neural         stem cells, progenitor cells, and oligodendrocytes. (Work is already         underway for a future report in <em>Avenues</em> reviewing the evidence         for how various antioxidants interact with chemotherapy – including         whether they increase or decrease chemotherapy effectiveness – and         their impact on chemotherapy side effects.)</p>
<p><strong><em>Melatonin</em></strong><br />
Melatonin is a hormone released from the pineal gland in the evening,           and secretion diminishes significantly with age. It is known to help           maintain cell health and many people take it to improve sleep. Melatonin           has also been shown to slow down neural cell death through its antioxidative         effects. Melatonin receptors in neural and glial progenitor cells have         been detected and play a role in neuroprotective strategies for Alzheimer&#8217;s         patients.16,17 Melatonin also has neuroprotective effects on both axons         and myelin sheaths of white matter after spinal cord injury, which helps         improves recovery.18,19 (Melatonin’s neuroprotective benefits are         akin or better to the steroid medication methylprednisolone, which is         also used after spinal cord injury.)20 Melatonin has also been demonstrated         to protect nerve fibers from damage due to lack of blood flow.21 Melatonin         is typically used in doses ranging from 1 to 10mg per capsule. Research         studies on its anti-tumor effects have reported on its use at up to 20mg         per day.5</p>
<p><strong><em>Epigallocatechin-gallate (EGCG)</em></strong><br />
EGCG is an active compound found in green tea leaves. It is an antioxidant         that is 25 to 100 times more potent than vitamins C and E.22 According         to an animal study, EGCG may promote neural stem cell survival or differentiation.23         This compound also inhibits the proliferation of many cancer cell lines.5         Research studies on its anti-tumor effects have employed a dosage range         between 460 to 550mg per day.5</p>
<p><strong><em>Alpha-lipoic Acid</em></strong><br />
Alpha-lipoic acid is an important antioxidant that can regenerate other         essential antioxidants, such as vitamins C and E, coenzyme Q10, and glutathione.         It is also a co-factor for some of the key enzymes (alpha-keto acid dehydrogenases)         involved in generating energy. In animal research that investigated the         aging process in rats and mice, alpha-lipoic acid has been shown to slow         down the development of age-related cognitive dysfunction and brain cell         deterioration.24 According to a laboratory study, alpha-lipoic acid protects         oligodendrocytes against oxidative damage.25 Alpha-lipoic acid is typically         used in a dosage range between 200 and 600mg per day.5</p>
<p><strong><em>Coenzyme Q10</em></strong><br />
Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) is produced by the human body and is necessary for         the basic functioning of cells. It is a vitamin-like substance that can         also act as an antioxidant. Among other functions, it is incorporated           into the mitochondria of cells throughout the body and facilitates           and regulates the transformation of fats and sugars into energy. Patients           with heart problems often use CoQ10. According to laboratory studies,           the oxidative damage to oligodendrocytes can be prevented using coenzyme           Q10.25 It may also protect oligodendrocytes during the terminal stages           of maturation.26 Coenzyme Q10 is typically used in a dosage range between           30 and 200mg per day.</p>
<p><strong><em>Quercetin</em></strong><br />
Quercetin is the most abundant of the plant-derived flavonoid molecules           and is a very active antioxidant. In laboratory studies, quercetin           has been demonstrated to prevent oxidative damage in oligodendrocytes.27           Quercetin is typically used in a dosage between 500 and 1500mg. Studies           have been published on its use as an anti-tumor treatment at doses           up to 3.8g per day.5</p>
<p><strong><em>Glutathione</em></strong><br />
Glutathione is a molecule synthesized in the body from three amino           acids: L-glutamic acid, L-cysteine, and glycine. Glutathione is one           of the body’s most important and powerful antioxidants           and a depletion of glutathione can be damaging to oligodendrocyte progenitor           cells.28 Glutathione is typically used in a dosage range between 250           and 500mg per day.</p>
<p><strong><em>N-acetyl Cysteine</em></strong><br />
N-acetyl cysteine is an efficiently absorbed and used form of the amino           acid, L-cysteine. In laboratory studies, N-acetyl cysteine has demonstrated           protective properties in the process of oligodendrocyte maturation.26           It is typically used in dosages ranging between 600 and 1800mg per           day.</p>
<p><em><strong>Folic Acid</strong></em><br />
Folic acid has been shown in laboratory studies to help stem cells           proliferate.29 Folic acid is a member of the B vitamin family and is           typically used in dosages ranging between 50 and 400μg.</p>
<p><strong><em>Vitamin K1         and K2</em></strong><br />
Vitamin K has been shown in laboratory studies to help in preventing         oxidative injury to developing oligodendrocytes and neurons.30</p>
<p><strong>SUMMARY</strong><br />
Since chemotherapy is currently an important element in many treatment         protocols, future research must focus on developing strategies to help           shield the brain from the toxic effects of chemotherapy as well as           on the development of more selective and targeted cancer drugs with           a lower side-effect profile. We believe that some of the work cited           above can suggest potentially non-toxic vitamin or plant-derived compounds           worthy of testing for their neuroprotective potential before, during,           or after chemotherapy treatment.</p>
<p><a href="http://pinestreetfoundation.org/avenues/avenues17/byoa17.html#top">Top of Page</a></p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p><strong>FROM STEM CELLS TO NEURONS</strong></p>
<p><img src="http://pinestreetfoundation.org/images/byoa17.jpg" alt="From Stem Cells to Neurons" width="514" height="606" /></p>
<p><strong>Step One &#8211; Neural Stem Cells</strong><br />
Neural stem cells (NSC) are cells that can mature into any type of cell and     can continually renew themselves.</p>
<p><strong>Step Two &#8211; Progenitor Cells</strong><br />
Progenitor cells do not themselves perform active neurological functions     but are “reserve” cells that become activated when mature nerve     tissue is damaged. When there is injury, the progenitor cells then develop     into mature active cells in order to repair or replace the damaged tissue.     Progenitor cells include:</p>
<p>GRP: Glial-Restricted Precursors<br />
NRP: Neuron Restricted Precursors<br />
O-2A/OPC: Oligodendrocyte-Type-2 Astrocytes</p>
<p><strong>Step Three &#8211; Mature Nerve Cells</strong><br />
Astrocytes are cells in the central nervous system that, while they are not     themselves nerve cells, provide several functions: (1) they provide a framework     of structural support in the brain for nerve cells, (2) they provide metabolic     support, assisting neurons to obtain nutrients, such as glucose, and (3)     they are part of the blood-brain barrier which protects the brain.</p>
<p>Neurons     are the primary nerve cells in the nervous system that process and transmit     information via electrical signals.</p>
<p>Oligodendrocytes are cells in     the central nervous system that, while they are not nerve cells themselves,     provide support and nutrition to nerve cells, help form the myelin coating     of nerve cells, and participate in signal transmission in the nervous system.</p>
<p>Adapted from Dietrich J, Han R, Yang Y, Mayer-Proschel M, Noble M. <em>CNS       progenitor cells and oligodendrocytes are targets of chemotherapeutic agents       in vitro and in vivo</em>. J Biol. Nov 30 2006;<strong>5</strong>(7):22., Page 3, Figure 1.</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p><strong>REFERENCES</strong></p>
<p><strong>1.</strong> Meyers     CA, Abbruzzese JL. Cognitive functioning in cancer patients: effect of previous     treatment. <em>Neurology. </em>Feb 1992;42(2):434-436.<br />
<strong>2.</strong> Dietrich     J, Han R, Yang Y, Mayer-Proschel M, Noble M. CNS progenitor cells and oligodendrocytes     are targets of chemotherapeutic agents in vitro and in vivo. <em>J Biol. </em>Nov     30 2006;5(7):22.<br />
<strong>3.</strong> Duffner     PK. The long term effects of chemotherapy on the central nervous system. <em>J     Biol. </em>Nov 30 2006;5(7):21.<br />
<strong>4.</strong> Silverman     DH, Dy CJ, Castellon SA, et al. Altered frontocortical, cerebellar, and basal     ganglia activity in adjuvant-treated breast cancer survivors 5-10 years after     chemotherapy. <em>Breast Cancer Res Treat. </em>Sep 29 2006.<br />
<strong>5.</strong> Boik     J. <em>Natural Compounds in Cancer Therapy</em>. Princeton: Oregon Medical     Press; 2001.<br />
<strong>6.</strong> Shen     LH, Zhang JT. [Culture of neural stem cells from cerebral cortex of rat embryo     and effects of drugs on the proliferation ability of stem cells]. <em>Yao     Xue Xue Bao. </em>Oct 2003;38(10):735-738.<br />
<strong>7.</strong> Kobayashi     J, Seiwa C, Sakai T, et al. Effect of a traditional Chinese herbal medicine,     Ren-Shen-Yang-Rong-Tang (Japanese name: Ninjin-Youei-To), on oligodendrocyte     precursor cells from aged-rat brain. <em>Int Immunopharmacol. </em>Jul 2003;3(7):1027-1039.<br />
<strong>8.</strong> Tang     Y, Yin HY, Zeng F, Yu SG. [Pondering in-situ induction of endogenous neural     stem cells in hippocampus of rats with Alzheimer disease by acupuncture]. <em>Zhong     Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao. </em>Sep 2005;3(5):351-354.<br />
<strong>9.</strong> Faiz     M, Acarin L, Peluffo H, Villapol S, Castellano B, Gonzalez B. Antioxidant     Cu/Zn SOD: expression in postnatal brain progenitor cells. <em>Neurosci Lett. </em>Jun     19 2006;401(1-2):71-76.<br />
<strong>10.</strong> Madhavan     L, Ourednik V, Ourednik J. Increased &#8220;vigilance&#8221; of antioxidant     mechanisms in neural stem cells potentiates their capability to resist oxidative     stress. <em>Stem Cells. </em>Sep 2006;24(9):2110-2119.<br />
<strong>11.</strong> Smith     J, Ladi E, Mayer-Proschel M, Noble M. Redox state is a central modulator     of the balance between self-renewal and differentiation in a dividing glial     precursor cell. <em>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. </em>Aug 29 2000;97(18):10032-10037.<br />
<strong>12.</strong> Abushamaa     AM, Sporn TA, Folz RJ. Oxidative stress and inflammation contribute to lung     toxicity after a common breast cancer chemotherapy regimen. <em>Am J Physiol     Lung Cell Mol Physiol. </em>Aug 2002;283(2):L336-345.<br />
<strong>13.</strong> Atessahin     A, Ceribasi AO, Yuce A, Bulmus O, Cikim G. Role of Ellagic Acid against Cisplatin-Induced     Nephrotoxicity and Oxidative Stress in Rats. <em>Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. </em>Feb     2007;100(2):121-126.<br />
<strong>14.</strong> Cortez-Pinto     H, Alexandrino P, Camilo ME, et al. Lack of effect of colchicine in alcoholic     cirrhosis: final results of a double blind randomized trial. <em>Eur J Gastroenterol     Hepatol. </em>Apr 2002;14(4):377-381.<br />
<strong>15.</strong> Woiniak     A, Drewa G, Wozniak B, et al. The effect of antitumor drugs on oxidative     stress in B16 and S91 melanoma cells in vitro. <em>Med Sci Monit. </em>Jan     2005;11(1):BR22-29.<br />
<strong>16.</strong> Niles     LP, Armstrong KJ, Rincon Castro LM, et al. Neural stem cells express melatonin     receptors and neurotrophic factors: colocalization of the MT1 receptor with     neuronal and glial markers. <em>BMC Neurosci. </em>Oct 28 2004;5(1):41.<br />
<strong>17.</strong> Antolin     I, Mayo JC, Sainz RM, et al. Protective effect of melatonin in a chronic     experimental model of Parkinson&#8217;s disease. <em>Brain Res. </em>Jul 12 2002;943(2):163-173.<br />
<strong>18.</strong> Ganguli     M, Vander Bilt J, Saxton JA, Shen C, Dodge HH. Alcohol consumption and cognitive     function in late life: a longitudinal community study. <em>Neurology. </em>Oct     25 2005;65(8):1210-1217.<br />
<strong>19.</strong> Cayli     SR, Kocak A, Yilmaz U, et al. Effect of combined treatment with melatonin     and methylprednisolone on neurological recovery after experimental spinal     cord injury. <em>Eur Spine J. </em>Dec 2004;13(8):724-732.<br />
<strong>20.</strong> Kaptanoglu     E, Tuncel M, Palaoglu S, Konan A, Demirpence E, Kilinc K. Comparison of the     effects of melatonin and methylprednisolone in experimental spinal cord injury. <em>J     Neurosurg. </em>Jul 2000;93(1 Suppl):77-84.<br />
<strong>21.</strong> Sayan     H, Ozacmak VH, Ozen OA, et al. Beneficial effects of melatonin on reperfusion     injury in rat sciatic nerve. <em>J Pineal Res. </em>Oct 2004;37(3):143-148.<br />
<strong>22.</strong> Pillai     SP, Mitscher LA, Menon SR, Pillai CA, Shankel DM. Antimutagenic/antioxidant     activity of green tea components and related compounds. <em>J Environ Pathol     Toxicol Oncol. </em>1999;18(3):147-158.<br />
<strong>23.</strong> Chen     CN, Liang CM, Lai JR, Tsai YJ, Tsay JS, Lin JK. Capillary electrophoretic     determination of theanine, caffeine, and catechins in fresh tea leaves and     oolong tea and their effects on rat neurosphere adhesion and migration. <em>J     Agric Food Chem. </em>Dec 3 2003;51(25):7495-7503.<br />
<strong>24.</strong> Cui     Y, Shu XO, Gao YT, Cai H, Tao MH, Zheng W. Association of Ginseng Use with     Survival and Quality of Life among Breast Cancer Patients. <em>Am J Epidemiol. </em>Apr     1 2006;163(7):645-653.<br />
<strong>25.</strong> Arlt     W, Callies F, van Vlijmen JC, et al. Dehydroepiandrosterone replacement in     women with adrenal insufficiency. <em>N Engl J Med. </em>Sep 30 1999;341(14):1013-1020.<br />
<strong>26.</strong> Cammer     W. Protection of cultured oligodendrocytes against tumor necrosis factor-alpha     by the antioxidants coenzyme Q(10) and N-acetyl cysteine. <em>Brain Res Bull. </em>Sep     30 2002;58(6):587-592.<br />
<strong>27.</strong> van     Meeteren ME, Hendriks JJ, Dijkstra CD, van Tol EA. Dietary compounds prevent     oxidative damage and nitric oxide production by cells involved in demyelinating     disease. <em>Biochem Pharmacol. </em>Mar 1 2004;67(5):967-975.<br />
<strong>28.</strong> Back     SA, Gan X, Li Y, Rosenberg PA, Volpe JJ. Maturation-dependent vulnerability     of oligodendrocytes to oxidative stress-induced death caused by glutathione     depletion. <em>J Neurosci. </em>Aug 15 1998;18(16):6241-6253.<br />
<strong>29.</strong> Sato     K, Kanno J, Tominaga T, Matsubara Y, Kure S. De novo and salvage pathways     of DNA synthesis in primary cultured neurall stem cells. <em>Brain Res. </em>Feb     3 2006;1071(1):24-33.<br />
<strong>30.</strong> Li     J, Lin JC, Wang H, et al. Novel role of vitamin k in preventing oxidative     injury to developing oligodendrocytes and neurons. <em>J Neurosci. </em>Jul     2 2003;23(13):5816-5826.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pinestreetfoundation.org/2007/03/21/your-mind-and-cancer-treatment-chemotherapy-related-cognitive-decline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your Mind and Cancer Treatment: Understanding and Addressing Cognitive Decline</title>
		<link>http://pinestreetfoundation.org/2005/12/21/your-mind-and-cancer-treatment-understanding-and-addressing-cognitive-decline/</link>
		<comments>http://pinestreetfoundation.org/2005/12/21/your-mind-and-cancer-treatment-understanding-and-addressing-cognitive-decline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 20:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PSFJA</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Avenues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Becoming Your Own Advocate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cognitive Decline]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinestreetfoundation.org/?p=365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Often called "chemobrain," patients going through various cancer treatments can sometimes experience cognitive dysfunction, such as slowed thinking, memory problems, and poor coordination. In the first of two new articles in our Becoming Your Own Advocate series, we address the issue of cognitive dysfunction by discussing its causes and offering various solutions that can help prevent or minimize its effects.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://pinestreetfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2005/12/byoa12.jpg"></a>Commonly referred to as &#8220;chemo brain&#8221; or    &#8220;chemo fog,&#8221; adverse     effects in cognitive  function are often experienced by patients      going through various cancer treatments.      This issue is frequently a topic in cancer support group meetings1 and has     been investigated in clinical studies where it is variously referred to as &#8220;chemotherapy-related     cognitive dysfunction,&#8221; &#8220;cognitive     deficit,&#8221; or &#8220;cognitive     decline.&#8221;2 Changes in cognitive ability      because of chemotherapy treatment may      be a type of autoimmune response or the result of chemical toxicity, oxidative     damage,  or inflammation in neurons.3<span id="more-365"></span></p>
<p>Many different types of cancer treatments can cause cognitive        damage. For example, whole-brain radiation has been reported        to cause substantial cognitive dysfunction.4 Fortunately, there is        some evidence that treatment with hyperbaric oxygen5 has been        successful for radiation-related cognitive dysfunction; this treatment       is now being investigated in a large, multi-center clinical  trial network       throughout Europe.6 (Information about this trial        is available through <a href="http://www.oxynet.org" target="_blank">www.oxynet.org</a>.)</p>
<p>In contrast to radiation, cognitive dysfunction related to        systemic chemotherapy is not as well understood. The purpose        of this article is to specifically discuss &#8220;chemobrain&#8221; by       describing the scope of the problem, outlining possible mechanisms by          which chemotherapy may impair brain function, and addressing        the methods used to evaluate and treat cognitive problems.</p>
<p><strong>DEFINITION OF COGNITIVE FUNCTION </strong><br />
Cognitive function is defined as thought processes and intellectual functions         such as memory, problem solving, and goal setting. Aspects of cognitive         function that have been studied with respect to chemotherapy       side effects include verbal ability, verbal        learning and memory (speed of information processing), visual        memory, spatial functioning, psychomotor functioning, attention        and concentration, executive (frontal) functioning, motor functioning and       coordination, and quality-of-life measures including  depression and anxiety.7</p>
<p><strong>WHAT IS THE EVIDENCE SEEN IN PATIENTS? </strong><br />
Numerous studies have been published in which the cognitive        side effects of chemotherapy were investigated. In one study,        for example, women with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy        were found to be more likely to experience cognitive dysfunction        than breast cancer patients who did not receive chemotherapy.8       In another study, women receiving chemotherapy experienced        significant differences in memory and language functioning as        compared to women one year post-chemotherapy and also compared to healthy       controls.9</p>
<p>These two studies were analyzed along with others in a        soon-to-be published meta-analysis conducted in Australia.10        The investigators in this study assessed the severity and nature        of cognitive impairment and then identified several important        patterns helpful in understanding this problem. Encouragingly,        they found that cognitive impairment does diminish over time;        most severe cognitive side effects of chemotherapy diminish        within two years. Additionally, the Australian researchers found        that the use of tamoxifen along with chemotherapy sharply exacerbates its       cognitive side effects. It is not yet known whether the  newer aromatase       inhibitor drug anastrazole (Arimidex) has the        same detrimental cognitive effects. Finally, the authors of this        meta-analysis found that the cognitive side effects of chemotherapy are       more severe in younger women.</p>
<p><strong>WHAT IS HAPPENING IN THE BRAIN?<br />
</strong><em>Measurable Physical Changes<br />
</em>Evidence for physical damage to the brain has been seen in studies       of chemotherapy-treated cancer survivors that were compared  to healthy       controls.11, 12 Using magnetic resonance imaging       (MRI), investigators discovered reductions in grey and white        matter that were widely distributed throughout the brain.</p>
<p>Evidence for changes in cerebral blood flow has been provid-        ed in a study of twelve breast cancer survivors, five to seven years        after diagnosis, compared to a group of healthy controls.13 Using        positron emission tomography (PET) scanning, investigators        discovered decreased metabolic activity in the prefrontal gyrus (a        part of the brain that is involved in “executive functions,” such                   as          decision-making, planning and judgment, and arithmetic) and          in Broca’s area (a part of the brain that is important for speech         and language). These metabolic changes were associated with                   reduced short-term memory in these patients. (See &#8220;Neurotoxicity         for Common Chemotherapeutic Agents&#8221; below.)</p>
<p>Evidence for neurophysiologic damage has been similarly provided in     a study of breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy.14 Patients       were monitored with standard electroencephalogram (EEG) and tested with     visual skills tasks.  Compared to controls, patients who had received chemotherapy     performed       slower on visual tasks and had demonstrable  EEG differences.</p>
<p><em>Cytokines </em><br />
There may be a biochemical element to the detrimental cognitive effects         of chemotherapy, specifically the possible increase in  the production         of cytokines in the brain. Cytokines are soluble        proteins and peptides which regulate the intensity and duration        of the immune response; they are produced in response to injury,       infection, or toxins, and are part of the inflammatory process. For        example, brain cytokine levels increase following stress exposure        and decrease after stress-relieving treatments. These cytokines        may be associated with cognitive dysfunction, although it is not       yet known whether chemotherapy increases production of cytokines or if       a measurement of cytokines in the circulating blood  provides a reliable       measure of their activity in the brain.1</p>
<p><em>Hormones</em><br />
Various studies have suggested that hormonal involvement        may also play a role in chemotherapy-related cognitive dysfunction.9, 15       Chemotherapy-induced menopause may contribute to this mechanism.16</p>
<p><em>Depression, Fatigue, and Anxiety </em><br />
Psychological factors may exacerbate the cognitive side effects of        chemotherapy. Potentially relevant are depression, fatigue, the        stress of diagnosis,17, 18 anxiety about the possibility of disease        recurrence,19, 20 and hormonal treatment.16 In the <a href="http://www.pinestreetfoundation.org/avenues/index.html">Winter 2004        issue of <em>Avenues</em></a>, we reported on the relationship between stress,       serum cortisol, social support, and quality of life. These factors       may play a role in the cognitive side effects of chemotherapy;        stress is likely to increase these side effects and having good social       support is likely to decrease them.</p>
<p><em>Genetic Predisposition </em><br />
Genetic factors may play a role; the e4 allele of apolipoprotein        is a genetic variation associated with an increased probability of       Alzheimer’s disease.21 People who carry this gene product and        who are treated with chemotherapy will be more likely to score        lower on visual memory, spatial ability, and psychomotor functioning tests.22</p>
<p><em>Clotting in Small Blood Vessels </em><br />
Chemotherapy is known to damage the inner lining of blood        vessels, which can lead to increased clotting of blood and possible       micro-strokes in the central nervous system.23 Furthermore,        this damage to the vessels could lead to increased production of        interleukins (compounds produced by cells of the immune system        that function in the regulation of the immune system), further        accentuating the changes in cognitive function.</p>
<p><a href="http://pinestreetfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2005/12/byoa12.jpg"><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; border: 0px initial initial;" title="Your Mind &amp; Cancer Treatment" src="http://pinestreetfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2005/12/byoa12.jpg" alt="Your Mind &amp; Cancer Treatment" width="400" height="360" /></a></p>
<p><strong>HOW CAN CHEMOBRAIN BE TREATED? </strong><br />
<em>Exercise</em><br />
Exercise appears to be essential to minimize the effects of chemobrain. In     the <a href="http://www.pinestreetfoundation.org/avenues/index.html">Winter 2004 issue of Avenues</a>, we summarized the  results of several studies     on exercise and quality of life for people     with cancer. Many studies now demonstrate the positive effects      of exercise in both preventing and treating chemotherapy-related      cognitive dysfunction.3, 24-29</p>
<p><em>Medications</em><br />
The use of aspirin in preventing or treating chemobrain was        discussed at a 2003 researchers&#8217; workshop in Banff, Canada,        on chemotherapy-related cognitive dysfunction. This approach might work       through preventing micro-coagulation of  the blood caused by chemotherapy.       Aspirin additionally suppresses production       by the body of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2),  a compound which suppresses immune       function and enhances        tumor cell growth.30</p>
<p>Donepezil (Aricept) has been shown to improve cognitive        function in people who have mild to moderate Alzheimer&#8217;s disease       and may be beneficial in the treatment of chemobrain.31 Also  promising,       the medication naltrexone has shown some evidence        in animal studies for treating cognitive side effects of interferon        treatment,32 but has not yet been tested with chemotherapy drugs        for its potential to reduce adverse cognitive effects.</p>
<p>Erythropoietin (EPO)7 is a neuroprotective compound that        is produced by the brain in response to stroke.33 When given as        a treatment, the compound EPO can improve the outcome of        stroke recovery.34 In a recent study in which 94 patients receiving chemotherapy       for breast cancer were randomized to either  EPO or placebo, the treatment       group had improved cognitive        performance after the fourth cycle of chemotherapy as compared        to controls who had slight deterioration.35 Additionally, some        researchers speculate that EPO would have a preventive effect if        given before chemotherapy.7 However, two recent trials suggest        EPO may adversely affect survival in breast cancer patients.36, 37        This may be due, in part, to the presence of erythropoietin receptors on       breast cancer cells.38, 39</p>
<p>Methylphenidate (Ritalin) can improve behavioral function        in patients with malignant glioma brain tumors40 and cognitive        function in survivors of childhood cancers.41 A trial of Ritalin in        170 women receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer is currently        underway at the University of Toronto.</p>
<p>Antioxidants have a potential role in preventing oxidative damage     to the brain and neurons. A substantial body of  literature has been generated,     specifically investigating the        ability of antioxidants to enhance chemotherapy effectiveness        and reduce its toxicity. These are efficiently reviewed in a series of       review articles published in 1999 and 2000;42, 43 some of the studies reviewed       in these two articles had already been        conducted over 25 years ago. (See &#8220;Antioxidants &amp; Chemotherapy&#8221;       below.)</p>
<p>Reduced toxicity of chemotherapy to healthy tissues has been demonstrated     by antioxidants and other compounds: For alkylating types of chemotherapy     (cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, busulfan, and melphalan), selenium,44 coenzyme     Q-10,45 melatonin,46 N-acetylcysteine,       and glutathione49, 50 have       been shown to reduce toxicity to healthy tissues.  For antibiotic types       of chemotherapy (Adriamycin, bleomycin,        epirubicin, and daunorubicin), vitamin A,51 vitamin E,52 selenium,53, 54       coenzyme Q-10,55-58 melatonin,59 and N-acetylcysteine  have been effective.60       For anti-metabolite types of chemotherapy        (5-FU and methotrexate), vitamin A,51, 61 coenzyme Q-10,45 and        glutathione have shown benefit in reduced toxicity.62, 63 Lastly, for        platinum chemotherapy (cisplatin and carboplatin), selenium,64-67        melatonin,68, 69 N-acetylcysteine,70, 71 and glutathione have been        shown to reduce toxicity to healthy tissues.49, 50</p>
<p><em>Compensatory Strategies </em><br />
Cognitive rehabilitation to help compensate for impaired          brain function has been shown to be helpful. Such rehabilitation can         include behavioral training, learning techniques to  organize information,         and training in memory enhancement          techniques.1, 2, 72-74 Some of these approaches are the focus of          a new journal, Rehabilitation Oncology (<a href="http://www.oncologypt.org/pubs" target="_blank">www.oncologypt.org/pubs</a>),         which deals specifically with approaches to recovery from cancer treatment-related         complications.75</p>
<p>A poignant moment occurred at the 2003 Banff chemobrain        workshop when one of the presenters, herself both a physician and       a breast cancer survivor, reported on her own cognitive problems        resulting from high-dose chemotherapy. She described several        strategies she used to cope with her difficulties, such as avoiding attempting       multiple tasks simultaneously, planning ahead to  avoid emergency situations,       reducing her workload, making lists        to organize her daily tasks, and getting more sleep.2</p>
<p><strong> WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE NEXT?<br />
</strong>It is clear that a substantial amount of work needs to be done to   develop better ways to prevent and treat chemotherapy-related    cognitive dysfunction. Participants at the 2003 Banff chemobrain workshop itemized   the challenges faced by researchers  studying this important problem:76<br />
»          A well-designed study should quantify the amount of cognitive decline         with measurements made before and after chemotherapy. However, problems         occur in measuring baseline brain function; for most people,         a cancer diagnosis is a time          of significant stress, which can itself impair concentration          and memory.<br />
»          A change may be statistically significant, but not clinically          meaningful. What is clinically meaningful in measuring          cognitive decline, however, has not yet been defined. Furthermore, questionnaires         and tests used to measure cognitive  function have not yet been designed         that would be valid in          different cultural settings.<br />
»          While a patient may measure within normal limits on a test          of cognitive function, it may still be below what is their own          acceptable norm.<br />
»          Previous studies have identified discrepancies between          subjective (by questionnaire) and objective (by neurological          testing) measurements of cognitive function. This may be          due to limitations of test methods. However, it may also be          due to the cognitive damage of chemotherapy having also          diminished the person’s ability to accurately gauge their own          condition; this is referred to as a &#8220;disorder of insight.&#8221;<br />
»          Problems with memory and concentration are often most          obvious when people return to daily life at work and home.          Most neurological tests currently in use are conducted in          the medical office or research setting, away from &#8220;real life&#8221;         context and demands. One good example is the Functional          Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive (FACT-Cog), a          simple self-reported questionnaire developed in consultation          with cancer patients and medical practitioners.</p>
<p><strong>CONCLUSIONS</strong><br />
It is encouraging that researchers have focused on this important problem.         Although only limited evidence is available,        there are several promising approaches that may satisfy the        conservative principle of “it could help, probably won’t hurt”:       (1) if anticipating chemotherapy treatment, do what you can        prior to beginning treatment to improve your physical stamina        through exercise, (2) do your best to maintain physical exercise        during chemotherapy treatment, (3) ask your doctor about the        advisability and safety of combining Ritalin and/or aspirin        with your chemotherapy treatment, (4) minimize your stress        levels and practice techniques that cultivate relaxation, and (5)        ask your doctor what vitamins and antioxidants can be safely        used between cycles of chemotherapy.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pinestreetfoundation.org/avenues/avenues12/byoa12.html#top">Top of Page</a></p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p><strong>ANTIOXIDANTS &amp; CHEMOTHERAPY<br />
</strong>The following two articles can provide an intelligent forum          for initiating discussion with your oncologist about the use          of antioxidants along with chemotherapy.</p>
<p><em>Antioxidants in Cancer Therapy: Their Actions and        Interactions with Oncologic Therapies<br />
</em>There is a concern that antioxidants might reduce oxidizing free radicals       created by radiotherapy and some forms  of chemotherapy, thereby decreasing       the effectiveness of        the therapy. The question has arisen whether concurrent        administration of oral antioxidants is contraindicated during cancer therapeutics.       Evidence reviewed here demonstrates exogenous antioxidants alone produce       beneficial effects in various cancers and,       except for a few specific        cases, animal and human studies demonstrate no reduction of efficacy of       chemotherapy or radiation when given  with antioxidants. In fact, considerable       data exists showing increased       effectiveness of many cancer therapeutic  agents, as well as a decrease       in adverse effects, when given        concurrently with antioxidants. [References: 180]</p>
<p><em>Lamson, D W and M S Brignall (1999). &#8220;Antioxidants       in cancer therapy: their actions and interactions with oncologic therapies.&#8221; </em>Alternative Medicine Review<em> 4(5): 304-329. </em></p>
<p><em>Antioxidants         and Cancer Therapy II:          Quick Reference Guide </em><br />
The previous lengthy review concerning the effects of antioxidant compounds         used concurrently with radiotherapy  and chemotherapy has been reduced         to a reference guide.          There are only three presently known examples in which          any agent classifiable as an antioxidant has been shown to          decrease effectiveness of radiation or chemotherapy in          vivo. The vast majority of both in vivo and in vitro studies          have shown enhanced effectiveness of standard cancer          therapies or a neutral effect on drug action.</p>
<p><em>Lamson, D W and M S Brignall (2000). &#8220;Antioxidants and        cancer therapy II: quick reference guide.&#8221;</em>Alternative       Medicine Review<em> 5(2): 152-63. </em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.pinestreetfoundation.org/avenues/avenues12/byoa12.html#top">Top of Page</a></p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p><strong>NEUROTOXICITY FOR COMMON          CHEMOTHERAPEUTIC AGENTS6<br />
</strong><em>Drug &#8211; Relative Degree of Neurotoxicity<br />
</em>Fluorouracil &#8211; High<br />
Methotrexate &#8211; High<br />
Tamoxifen &#8211; Moderate<br />
Vincristine &#8211; Moderate<br />
Cyclophosphamide &#8211; Possibly Increased<br />
Paclitaxel &#8211; Possibly Increased<br />
Doxorubicin &#8211; Possibly Increased<br />
Dexamethasone, methylprednisolone &#8211; Uncertain</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p><em>References:</em><br />
1.	Tannock IF, Ahles TA, Ganz PA, Van Dam FS. Cognitive impairment associated     with chemotherapy for cancer: report of a workshop. <em>J     Clin Oncol</em>. Jun 1 2004;<strong>22</strong>(11):2233-2239.<br />
2. Galantino ML, Henderson A, Michaels J. Cognitive Challenges for Women Undergoing   Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Treatment for Breast Cancer: The Role of Rehabilitation   Oncology. <em>Rehabilitation Oncology</em>. 2005;<strong>23(</strong>1):7.<br />
3. Barton D, Loprinzi C. Novel approaches to preventing chemotherapy-induced   cognitive dysfunction in breast cancer: the art of the possible. <em>Clin   Breast Cancer</em>. Dec 2002;3 Suppl 3:S121-127.<br />
4. Ahles TA, Silberfarb PM, Herndon J, 2nd, et al. Psychologic and neuropsychologic   functioning of patients with limited small-cell lung cancer treated with chemotherapy   and radiation therapy with or without warfarin: a study by the Cancer and Leukemia   Group B. <em>J Clin Oncol</em>. May 1998;<strong>16</strong>(5):1954-1960.<br />
5. Hulshof MC, Stark NM, van der Kleij A, Sminia P, Smeding HM, Gonzalez Gonzalez   D. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for cognitive disorders after irradiation of the   brain. <em>Strahlenther Onkol</em>. Apr 2002;<strong>178</strong>(4):192-198.<br />
6. Mayer R, Hamilton-Farrell MR, van der Kleij AJ, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen   and radiotherapy. <em>Strahlenther Onkol</em>. Feb 2005;<strong>181</strong>(2):113-123.<br />
7. Rugo HS, Ahles T. The impact of adjuvant therapy for breast cancer on cognitive   function: current evidence and directions for research. <em>Semin   Oncol</em>. Dec 2003;<strong>30</strong>(6):749-762.<br />
8. Schagen SB, van Dam FS, Muller MJ, Boogerd W, Lindeboom J, Bruning PF. Cognitive   deficits after postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for breast carcinoma. <em>Cancer</em>.   Feb 1 1999;<strong>85</strong>(3):640-650.<br />
9. Brezden CB, Phillips KA, Abdolell M, Bunston T, Tannock IF. Cognitive function   in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. <em>J   Clin Oncol</em>. Jul   2000;<strong>18</strong>(14):2695-2701.<br />
10. Falleti MG, Sanfilippo A, Maruff P, Weih L, Phillips KA. The nature and   severity of cognitive impairment associated with adjuvant chemotherapy in women   with breast cancer: A meta-analysis of the current literature. <em>Brain   Cogn</em>.   Jun 20 2005.<br />
11. Saykin AJ, Ahles TA, McDonald BC. Mechanisms of chemotherapy-induced cognitive   disorders: neuropsychological, pathophysiological, and neuroimaging perspectives.   <em>Semin Clin Neuropsychiatry</em>. Oct 2003;<strong>8</strong>(4):201-216.<br />
12. Saykin AJ, Ahles TA, Schoenfeld JD. Grey matter reduction on voxel-based   morphometry in chemotherapy-treated cancer survivors. <em>J   Int Neuropsychol Soc</em>.   2003;9:246.<br />
13. Silverman DH, Castellon SA, Abraham L. Abnormal regional brain metabolism   in breast cancer survivors after adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with cognitive   changes. <em>Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol</em>. 2003 (abstr 47);22:12.<br />
14. Schagen SB, Hamburger HL, Muller MJ. Neuropsychological evaluation of late   effects of adjuvant high-dose chemotherapy on cognitive function. <em>J   Neurooncol</em>.   2001;51:159-165.<br />
15. Goodwin PJ, Ennis M, Pritchard KI, Trudeau M, Hood N. Risk of menopause   during the first year after breast cancer diagnosis. <em>J   Clin Oncol</em>. Aug 1999;<strong>17</strong>(8):2365-2370.<br />
16. Bender CM, Paraska KK, Sereika SM, Ryan CM, Berga SL. Cognitive Function   and Reproductive Hormones in Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer: A Critical   Review. <em>Journal of Pain and Symptom Management</em>. May 2001;<strong>21</strong>(5):407-424.<br />
17. Cimprich B, Ronis DL. Attention and symptom distress in women with and   without breast cancer. <em>Nurs Res</em>. Mar-Apr 2001;<strong>50</strong>(2):86-94.<br />
18. Cimprich B. Pretreatment symptom distress in women newly diagnosed with   breast cancer. <em>Cancer Nurs</em>. Jun 1999;<strong>22</strong>(3):185-194; quiz 195.<br />
19. Lee-Jones C, Humphris G, Dixon R, Hatcher MB. Fear of cancer recurrence&#8211;a   literature review and proposed cognitive formulation to explain exacerbation   of recurrence fears. <em>Psychooncology</em>. Jun 1997;<strong>6</strong>(2):95-105.<br />
20. Bower JE, Ganz PA, Desmond KA, Rowland JH, Meyerowitz BE, Belin TR. Fatigue   in breast cancer survivors: occurrence, correlates, and impact on quality of   life. <em>J Clin Oncol</em>. Feb 2000;<strong>18</strong>(4):743-753.<br />
21. Bennett DA, Wilson RS, Schneider JA, et al. Apolipoprotein E epsilon4 allele,   AD pathology, and the clinical expression of Alzheimer&#8217;s disease. <em>Neurology</em>.   Jan 28 2003;<strong>60</strong>(2):246-252.<br />
22. Ahles TA, Saykin AJ, Noll WW, et al. The relationship of APOE genotype   to neuropsychological performance in long-term cancer survivors treated with   standard dose chemotherapy. <em>Psychooncology</em>. Sep 2003;<strong>12</strong>(6):612-619.<br />
23. Levine MN, Gent M, Hirsh J, et al. The thrombogenic effect of anticancer   drug therapy in women with stage II breast cancer. <em>N Engl   J Med</em>. Feb 18 1988;<strong>318</strong>(7):404-407.<br />
24. Schulz KH, Heesen C. [Effects of exercise in chronically ill patients.   Examples from oncology and neurology]. <em>Bundesgesundheitsblatt   Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz</em>. Aug 2005;<strong>48</strong>(8):906-913.<br />
25. Dimeo FC, Thomas F, Raabe-Menssen C, Propper F, Mathias M. Effect of aerobic   exercise and relaxation training on fatigue and physical performance of cancer   patients after surgery. A randomised controlled trial. <em>Support   Care Cancer</em>.   Nov 2004;<strong>12</strong>(11):774-779.<br />
26. Hartmann U, Ring C, Reuss-Borst MA. [Improvement of health-related quality   of life in breast cancer patients by inpatient rehabilitation]. <em>Med   Klin (Munich)</em>.   Aug 15 2004;<strong>99</strong>(8):422-429.<br />
27. Lesage P, Portenoy RK. Management of fatigue in the cancer patient. <em>Oncology   (Williston Park)</em>. Mar 2002;<strong>16</strong>(3):373-378, 381; discussion 381-372, 385-376,   388-379.<br />
28. Ott CD, Lindsey AM, Waltman NL, et al. Facilitative strategies, psychological   factors, and strength/weight training behaviors in breast cancer survivors   who are at risk for osteoporosis. <em>Orthop Nurs</em>. Jan-Feb 2004;<strong>23</strong>(1):45-52.<br />
29. Fialka-Moser V, Crevenna R, Korpan M, Quittan M. Cancer rehabilitation:   particularly with aspects on physical impairments. <em>J Rehabil   Med</em>. Jul 2003;<strong>35</strong>(4):153-162.<br />
30. Hwang SL, Lee KS, Lin CL, et al. Effect of aspirin and indomethacin on   prostaglandin E2 synthesis in C6 glioma cells. <em>Kaohsiung   J Med Sci.</em> Jan 2004;<strong>20</strong>(1):1-5.<br />
31. Rogers SL, Farlow MR, Doody RS, Mohs R, Friedhoff LT. A 24-week, double-blind,   placebo-controlled trial of donepezil in patients with Alzheimer&#8217;s disease.   Donepezil Study Group. <em>Neurology</em>. Jan 1998;<strong>50</strong>(1):136-145.<br />
32. Valentine AD, Meyers CA, Talpaz M. Treatment of neurotoxic side effects   of interferon-alpha with naltrexone. <em>Cancer Invest</em>. 1995;<strong>13</strong>(6):561-566.<br />
33. Masuda S, Okano M, Yamagishi K, Nagao M, Ueda M, Sasaki R. A novel site   of erythropoietin production. Oxygen-dependent production in cultured rat astrocytes.   <em>J Biol Chem</em>. Jul 29 1994;<strong>269</strong>(30):19488-19493.<br />
34. Ehrenreich H, Hasselblatt M, Dembowski C, et al. Erythropoietin therapy   for acute stroke is both safe and beneficial. <em>Mol Med</em>. Aug 2002;<strong>8</strong>(8):495-505.<br />
35. O&#8217;Shaughnessy JA. Effects of epoetin alfa on cognitive function, mood,   asthenia, and quality of life in women with breast cancer undergoing adjuvant   chemotherapy. <em>Clin Breast Cancer</em>. Dec 2002;3 Suppl 3:S116-120.<br />
36. Leyland-Jones B. Breast cancer trial with erythropoietin terminated unexpectedly.   <em>Lancet Oncol</em>. Aug 2003;<strong>4</strong>(8):459-460.<br />
37. Henke M, Laszig R, Rube C, et al. Erythropoietin to treat head and neck   cancer patients with anaemia undergoing radiotherapy: randomised, double-blind,   placebo-controlled trial. <em>Lancet</em>. Oct 18 2003;<strong>362</strong>(9392):1255-1260.<br />
38. Arcasoy MO, Amin K, Karayal AF, et al. Functional significance of erythropoietin   receptor expression in breast cancer. <em>Lab Invest</em>. Jul 2002;<strong>82</strong>(7):911-918.<br />
39. Yasuda Y, Fujita Y, Matsuo T, et al. Erythropoietin regulates tumour growth   of human malignancies. <em>Carcinogenesis</em>. Jun 2003;<strong>24</strong>(6):1021-1029.<br />
40. Meyers CA, Weitzner MA, Valentine AD, Levin VA. Methylphenidate therapy   improves cognition, mood, and function of brain tumor patients. <em>J   Clin Oncol</em>.   Jul 1998;<strong>16</strong>(7):2522-2527.<br />
41. Thompson SJ, Leigh L, Christensen R, et al. Immediate neurocognitive effects   of methylphenidate on learning-impaired survivors of childhood cancer. <em>J   Clin Oncol</em>. Mar 15 2001;<strong>19</strong>(6):1802-1808.<br />
42. Lamson DW, Brignall MS. Antioxidants and cancer therapy II: quick reference   guide. <em>Altern Med Rev</em>. Apr 2000;<strong>5</strong>(2):152-163.<br />
43. Lamson DW, Brignall MS. Antioxidants in cancer therapy; their actions and   interactions with oncologic therapies. <em>Alternative Medicine   Review</em>. 1999;<strong>4</strong>(5):304-329.<br />
44. Tobey RA, Tesmer JG. Differential response of cultured human normal and   tumor cells to trace element-induced resistance to the alkylating agent melphalan.   <em>Cancer Res</em>. Jun 1985;<strong>45</strong>(6):2567-2571.<br />
45. Takimoto M, Sakurai T, Kodama K, et al. [Protective effect of CoQ 10 administration   on cardial toxicity in FAC therapy]. <em>Gan To Kagaku Ryoho</em>. Jan 1982;<strong>9</strong>(1):116-121.<br />
46. Musatov SA, Rosenfeld SV, Togo EF, Mikheev VS, Anisimov VN. [The influence   of melatonin on mutagenicity and antitumor action of cytostatic drugs in mice].   <em>Vopr Onkol</em>. 1997;<strong>43</strong>(6):623-627.<br />
47. Slavik M, Saiers JH. Phase I clinical study of acetylcysteine&#8217;s preventing   ifosfamide-induced hematuria. <em>Semin Oncol</em>. Mar 1983;<strong>10</strong>(1 Suppl 1):62-65.<br />
48. Holoye PY, Duelge J, Hansen RM, Ritch PS, Anderson T. Prophylaxis of ifosfamide   toxicity with oral acetylcysteine. <em>Semin Oncol</em>. Mar 1983;<strong>10</strong>(1 Suppl 1):66-71.<br />
49. Di Re F, Bohm S, Oriana S, et al. High-dose cisplatin and cyclophosphamide   with glutathione in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. <em>Ann   Oncol</em>. Jan   1993;<strong>4</strong>(1):55-61.<br />
50. Locatelli MC, D&#8217;Antona A, Labianca R, et al. A phase II study of combination   chemotherapy in advanced ovarian carcinoma with cisplatin and cyclophosphamide   plus reduced glutathione as potential protective agent against cisplatin toxicity.   <em>Tumori</em>. Feb 28 1993;<strong>79</strong>(1):37-39.<br />
51. Thatcher N, Blackledge G, Crowther D. Advanced recurrent squamous cell   carcinoma of the head and neck. Results of a chemotherapeutic regimen with   adriamycin, bleomycin, 5-fluorouracil, methotrextate, and vitamin A. <em>Cancer</em>.   Sep 15 1980;<strong>46</strong>(6):1324-1328.<br />
52. Kurbacher CM, Wagner U, Kolster B, Andreotti PE, Krebs D, Bruckner HW.   Ascorbic acid (vitamin C) improves the antineoplastic activity of doxorubicin,   cisplatin, and paclitaxel in human breast carcinoma cells in vitro. <em>Cancer   Lett</em>. Jun 5 1996;<strong>103</strong>(2):183-189.<br />
53. Boucher F, Coudray C, Tirard V, et al. Oral selenium supplementation in   rats reduces cardiac toxicity of adriamycin during ischemia and reperfusion.   <em>Nutrition</em>. Sep-Oct 1995;<strong>11</strong>(5 Suppl):708-711.<br />
54. Coudray C, Hida H, Boucher F, De Leiris J, Favier A. Modulation by selenium   supplementation of lipid peroxidation induced by chronic administration of   adriamycin in rats. <em>Nutrition</em>. Sep-Oct 1995;<strong>11</strong>(5 Suppl):512-516.<br />
55. Cortes EP, Gupta M, Chou C, Amin VC, Folkers K. Adriamycin cardiotoxicity:   early detection by systolic time interval and possible prevention by coenzyme   Q10. <em>Cancer Treat Rep</em>. Jun 1978;<strong>62</strong>(6):887-891.<br />
56. Iarussi D, Auricchio U, Agretto A, et al. Protective effect of coenzyme   Q10 on anthracyclines cardiotoxicity: control study in children with acute   lymphoblastic leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. <em>Mol Aspects   Med</em>. 1994;15 Suppl:s207-212.<br />
57. Okuma K, Furuta I, Ota K. [Protective effect of coenzyme Q10 in cardiotoxicity   induced by adriamycin]. <em>Gan To Kagaku Ryoho</em>. Mar 1984;<strong>11</strong>(3):502-508.<br />
58. Shaeffer J, El-Mahdi AM, Nichols RK. Coenzyme Q10 and adriamycin toxicity   in mice. <em>Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol</em>. Aug 1980;<strong>29</strong>(2):309-315.<br />
59. Lissoni P, Tancini G, Paolorossi F, et al. Chemoneuroendocrine therapy   of metastatic breast cancer with persistent thrombocytopenia with weekly low-dose   epirubicin plus melatonin: a phase II study. <em>J Pineal   Res</em>. Apr 1999;<strong>26</strong>(3):169-173.<br />
60. Olson RD, Stroo WE, Boerth RC. Influence of N-acetylcysteine on the antitumor   activity of doxorubicin. <em>Semin Oncol</em>. Mar 1983;<strong>10</strong>(1 Suppl 1):29-34.<br />
61. Nagai Y, Horie T, Awazu S. Vitamin A, a useful biochemical modulator capable   of preventing intestinal damage during methotrexate treatment. <em>Pharmacol   Toxicol</em>.   Aug 1993;<strong>73</strong>(2):69-74.<br />
62. Danysz A, Wierzba K, Pniewska A. The effect of sulfhydryl compounds on   5-fluorouracil toxicity and distribution. <em>Arch Immunol   Ther Exp</em>. 1983;31:373-379.<br />
63. Danysz A, Wierzba K, Wutkiewicz M. Influence of some sulfhydryl compounds   on the antineoplastic effectiveness of 5-fluorouracil and 6-mercaptopurine.   <em>Arch Immunol Ther Exp</em>. 1984;32:345-349.<br />
64. Naganuma A, Satoh M, Imura N. Effect of selenite on renal toxicity and   antitumor activity of cis-diamminedichloroplatinum in mice inoculated with   Ehrlich ascites tumor cell. <em>J Pharmacobiodyn</em>. Mar 1984;<strong>7</strong>(3):217-220.<br />
65. Berry JP, Pauwells C, Tlouzeau S, Lespinats G. Effect of selenium in combination   with cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) in the treatment of murine fibrosarcoma.   <em>Cancer Res</em>. Jul 1984;<strong>44</strong>(7):2864-2868.<br />
66. Ohkawa K, Tsukada Y, Dohzono H, Koike K, Terashima Y. The effects of co-administration   of selenium and cis-platin (CDDP) on CDDP-induced toxicity and antitumour activity.   <em>Br J Cancer</em>. Jul 1988;<strong>58</strong>(1):38-41.<br />
67. Hu YJ, Chen Y, Zhang YQ, et al. The protective role of selenium on the   toxicity of cisplatin-contained chemotherapy regimen in cancer patients. <em>Biol   Trace Elem Res</em>. Mar 1997;<strong>56</strong>(3):331-341.<br />
68. Lissoni P, Paolorossi F, Ardizzoia A, et al. A randomized study of chemotherapy   with cisplatin plus etoposide versus chemoendocrine therapy with cisplatin,   etoposide and the pineal hormone melatonin as a first-line treatment of advanced   non-small cell lung cancer patients in a poor clinical state. <em>J   Pineal Res</em>.   Aug 1997;<strong>23</strong>(1):15-19.<br />
69. Ghielmini M, Pagani O, de Jong J, et al. Double-blind randomized study   on the myeloprotective effect of melatonin in combination with carboplatin   and etoposide in advanced lung cancer. <em>Br J Cancer</em>. Jun 1999;<strong>80</strong>(7):1058-1061.<br />
70. Roller A, Weller M. Antioxidants specifically inhibit cisplatin cytotoxicity   of human malignant glioma cells. <em>Anticancer Res</em>. Nov-Dec 1998;<strong>18</strong>(6A):4493-4497.<br />
71. Miyajima A, Nakashima J, Tachibana M, Nakamura K, Hayakawa M, Murai M.   N-acetylcysteine modifies cis-dichlorodiammineplatinum-induced effects in bladder   cancer cells. <em>Jpn J Cancer Res</em>. May 1999;<strong>90</strong>(5):565-570.<br />
72. Oxman TE, Schnurr PP, Silberfarb PM. Assessment of cognitive function in   cancer patients. <em>Hosp J</em>. 1986;<strong>2</strong>(3):99-128.<br />
73. Sohlberg MM, Mateer CA. Effectiveness of an attention-training program.   <em>J Clin Exp Neuropsychol</em>. Apr 1987;<strong>9</strong>(2):117-130.<br />
74. Ferguson RJ, Ahles TA. Low neuropsychologic performance among adult cancer   survivors treated with chemotherapy. <em>Curr Neurol Neurosci   Rep</em>. May 2003;<strong>3</strong>(3):215-222.<br />
75. Walters SJ, Brazier JE. Comparison of the minimally important difference   for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D. <em>Qual   Life Res</em>. Aug   2005;<strong>14</strong>(6):1523-1532.<br />
76. Wagner LI, Sweet J, Cella D. Chemotherapy-related cognitive deficits: A   qualitative examination of patients and providers. <em>Ann   Behav Med</em>. 2003;<strong>25</strong>(S056).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pinestreetfoundation.org/2005/12/21/your-mind-and-cancer-treatment-understanding-and-addressing-cognitive-decline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

